Syrian Rising

The pro-democratic Arab Spring has made a lot of gains in the Middle East, leading to regime change in Egypt and Libya and significant reform in other countries. However, in Syria the embattled government of President Bashar al-Assad has brutally repressed dissidents. It is hard to get an exact picture of what is happening because journalists are allowed to report from inside Syria. What we do know is that the Government is using the its' armed forces and armored vehicles in an attempt to isolate and crush opposition members, supporters and sympathizers.

Out of the chaos comes the sad tale of the Alhusni family. Several years ago Mr. Alhusni died leaving a wife and four small children in a country with conditions not favorable to a single mother. When the anti-Government protests broke out in March young Mohammed Alhusni became one of the local leaders of the protests. In response the Government began targeting his family. Last month his 18 year old sister, Zainab, disappeared while buying groceries.

A few weeks ago Mohammed was wounded and captured during a protest. When they went to claim his body he showed signs of torture. Then his family was told there was another body in the freezer. It was Zainab.

"When the family received the body, her head and arms had been chopped off. Chunks of her flesh were charred, appearing in places to have been melted or burned down to the bone."
Zainab was brutally tortured and murdered to make a point: Families of dissidents will now be targeted. Against this kind of evil and repression it is imperative the people of Syria succeed in rebellion Against this kind of evil and repression they might not be able to succeed. But there is always prayer

Lucifer the Fire-Bringer

Prometheus was a sort of folk hero in Greek Myth, the patron of man. He is known for trying to thwart the all powerful Zeus on behalf of mankind. There are of course, more than one version of the story and many ways to interpret those stories. My intent is not a discourse on Greek Classics, but rather a far more important theme: Fire.

While Prometheus did several things to aid man to the detriment of Zeus, it is his theft of fire for which he is best known. However, the theft came at the tail end of a series of events wherein Prometheus tried to usurp Zeus as the God of man.

It was Prometheus who first gave man fire, which could be summed up by a Greek as gnosis, sophia, and techne, when he saw that they lacked "good" qualities like claws, fur, wings etc.

When Zeus instituted a sacrificial meal, to be a settling of accounts between mortals and immortals, Prometheus attempted to undermine Zeus.

Knowing that whatever happened at this, the first settlement, would set president for all future settlements, Prometheus tried to trick Zeus into accepting a worthless sacrifice so that man would have an easy time. Zeus was not fooled by Prometheus's deception, having already decided that man could keep and eat the meat, and he went along with it. However, Prometheus's attempted usurpation greatly angered Zeus and he hid fire from man.

Prometheus then stole fire from the sun and gave it to mankind, imbuing them with knowledge. It was in response to this act that caused Zeus to banish Prometheus and "punish" man by sending Pandora, the first woman. With her came a box, containing all the evils in the world, that was bound to be opened sooner or later. When it was opened they came out, hunger, sickness, war, sorrow etc., leaving only one thing trapped inside by the time it was closed. Later, when Pandora opened it a second time Hope came into the world.

Arguably, Prometheus's rebellion was totally unnecessary because he simply played into Zeus's hand. Zeus was not opposed to giving man fire, indeed, if he took it once he could have taken it twice. The most valuable gift mankind received was not the fire the Prometheus stole, but the hope that came to man through a woman. If Prometheus had his way, man would have been alone in a warm but hopeless world.

With the story of Prometheus in mind, we see the sad tale of Lucifer, Son of the Morning, a bit more clearly. Here we have a lesser being, Lucifer, trying first to replace God the Father, then undermine him and finally replace him as the God of Man.

When God revealed his plan to send his spirit children to earth to test and progress them on their path to godhood, it was revealed that not all would make it. Lucifer, a Son of the Morning, boldly declared that he had a much better plan. If he were in charge he could guarantee 100% success, all would ascend and be perfected. He came up with a "better" plan, and felt he was entitled to take the place of God because clearly he was superior to God.

At this point I am going to leave Greek myth and deal with the Devil. I think it is important to ponder on what Lucifer was thinking. It is clear, from his final demand "give me thine honor" that he was a lesser being than God. For if they were equals then why did he need the "honor" of a god to proceed? Surely then he knew that a coup was risky.

What then is the "honor" of Godhood? Scripture tells us that the glory of God is intelligence. It would seem then that the Honor of God is the secrets of the universe, that enable one to be all powerful and all knowing. It was this that Lucifer most desired, the ultimate power. He knew that there was risk in God's plan because souls would be placed on Earth to be truly tested and not all would be found worthy. To assure his ascension, he took the populist rout and tried to dethrone God by making wild promises to the assembly of angels. This use of force to acquire power when patience and worthiness was required, but lacking, is very reminiscent of the fellow-craftsmen who killed Hiram Abiff in trying to obtain the Master's Word.

Then there came the voice of another, saying, "Father, thy will be done and the glory be thine forever." The two paths were very, very different, one required only the dissemination of knowledge, the other demanded a high degree of spiritual development and personal sacrifice. Where the difference is most pronounced though is between the role of the "Savior" of each plan. For Lucifer, he would get great personal gain with almost no work. For Jesus, it would exact an unimaginable toll at Golgotha.

This sparked the war in heaven, with a full third of the spirits putting their trust in Lucifer to exalt them. However, the expulsion of Lucifer and his followers was the beginning, not the end, of the war. When Adam and Eve were sent to earth they forgot all that they knew in the old world, becoming innocent. In this state they walked and talked with God on a regular basis. Seeing that fire had been taken from man by God, Lucifer saw a second chance to usurp and become ruler of man by breaking their connection with God and assuming the role of their teacher and savior.

We see this clearly from the manner in which Lucifer convinced the Serpent, previously a guardian for Eve, to convince Eve to eat of the forbidden fruit. The Lie, the Great, but appealing, Lie is that knowledge and power make one a god and it is through the acquisition of power, not faith through obedience that exalts.

It was only as a result of the necessary fall of Adam and Eve that Christ and the Atonement could come into the world. Prior to the Fall Adam and Eve could not have children, the central element of God's Plan of Salvation. In their innocent state in the Garden of Eden they would have remained forever, indeed, we have no idea how long they were in the garden before the fall, it could have been a day, it could have been 10,000,000 years, we don't know.

What we do know is that it was after and in consequence of the fall that the law of sacrifice was given as a reminder that the "seed of the woman" (Christ) would eventually crush the head of the serpent Lucifer.

The final question: Is what Lucifer did, in bringing about the Fall wrong, given that the work of God was enabled to go forth because of it? Yes, because of why he did it. It was done to frustrate the work of God, bringing about the eternal life and immortality of man, by breaking their connection with God and damning their souls to enhance his own power and standing. Just because God salvaged things doesn't make it ok.

In the final analysis then, the fault of Satan is that he is blinded by his own mad grab for power, seeking it to the detriment of all others and everything else in the universe, it is his single minded, all consuming quest for Fire.

Evil and Wrong Too

In post-9/11/01 America, (as well as post-3/11/04 Spain and post-7/7/05 Britain) there is quite a bit of fear and resentment floating around towards Islam, for some odd reason I can't think of at the moment. In the US there have been those who have tried to bring a little humor and a little reason to the situation. A few years ago a show built around social commentary brought up the effect of attempts to depict Mohammad. After a decent commentary they asked, (dared) their network to allow them freedom of speech in their next episode. The network backed out and censored it.

But we are not here to discuss that issue. We are here to discuss the valiant efforts of Muzzammil Hassan to change negative public perceptions about Muslims. In 2004, they launched Bridges TV in Orchard Park, N.Y., which featured a mix of religious, cultural and news programming from a Muslim perspective, as well as non-Muslim programming. The station, operated by a multi-religious group.

In February 2009 his wife had the gall to file for divorce. He didn't take it well. Not wanting to propagate negative stereotypes of Muslims he did the civilized thing and.....no, wait, actually, he cut her head off in the TV station's office. Turns out that sort of thing is illegal in America and he got convicted. But you know what? Maybe he is the victim in all this......at least he thinks so.........because I don't see how a headless body could be seen as more of a victim than a convicted killer.

Boy, wouldn't it be terrible if Islam was unfairly portrayed as misogynistic?

Evil and Wrong

Another sad story of abuse of women in Islam has come to us out of Yemen. A 12 year old girl died from internal bleeding caused by intercourse three days after being married to an older man. I quote from the article, "Child brides are common in Yemen, where the United Nations estimates that one in three girls are married before age 18. Most are married off to older men with more than one wife, according to a study by Sanaa University." Certainly, Arab Islamic culture is not unique in having sex crazed men seeking ever more, and younger, women; if anything that's a global trend. What is unique is the degree to which it is entrenched, institutionalized, encouraged and even justified by the Koran.

It is known that Mohammad had four wives and widely accepted that he married he favorite wife, Aisha, at the age of six but held off consummating until she was nine. In Sura 2:223 (the Cow) Mohammad tells husbands that their wife is their "tilth" or field, to be entered and "plowed" as they please. Sura 65:4 (Divorce) outlines the procedures for divorcing your wife, with special instructions in case she has not yet reached puberty. There seems to be a doctrine that a Muslim man can do anything Mohammad did, hence why most Muslim countries allow up to four wives and taking young girls to wife is allowed and even encouraged, but you are not to consummate until "later" (wink) when they are grown up, like twelve. In addition, several verses refer to women as property. The degree to which the Koran dehumanizes women is truly appalling. Verses like 4:11 and 2:282 plainly say that a woman is worth half a man. 4:11 is where inheritance rules are laid down and women can only inherit half as much as a man. In 2:282 rules for witnesses are explained and also explained is that it takes two women to equal the mental faculties of a man.

Not wanting all of its misogynist credentials to come from sexual exploitation, Islam also threw in spousal abuse. Highlights from those six clips include in the second to last one at about 1:30 the cleric praying for spousal abuse, other juicy tidbits include viewing it as "therapeutic", not more than ten times, no causing bleeding, only a small stick, not in the face, not in front of children etc. Now the obvious counter-argument is that I found the six worst clerics and posted them, ignoring all of the moderates. To speak to that, I would like someone to come up with "moderate" clerics speaking differently on the issue. I actually kind think those were the moderates, given that they were advocating limits on wife beating not backed up by the Koran. Sura 4:34 (Women), a major verse on wife beating, has six main translations, five of the six say beat or scourge and the sixth dubiously inserts words to change the meaning to "beat them (lightly)"

While you can find strange inconsistencies in the lives of early leaders of other faiths, (Joseph Smith and Brigham Young's multiple wives come to mind) where this becomes salient is when trying to examine the status of women in Islam today. I can't conclusively prove the Koran is the cause of Muslim women's sad state today I think it's a good window. It could be a chicken and egg case, cultural attitudes bleeding over into the texts. What is clear is that the attitudes and practices in the Koran are a big part of the culture.

Now where this starts to get really interesting is when we take into account Islam's condemnation of the West as being decadent and morally corrupt. I agree, we are, For crying out loud, we defend the proliferation of Pornography in the West. Not only is pornography incredibly morally repugnant but its' highly caustic and destructive effect on society is almost impossible to overstate. I won't go into the whole terrorism vs. taking a moral stand in seeking change, we all have our preferred methods of changing the world for the better. In the West we have our fair share of sexual predators, the difference is we don't use scripture to legally protect it.